Data Center
Headhunters
Call 305-306-4829Start a Search
PositionsAboutSalary guideJob seekersContactStart a Search

All roles A to Z

Data Center Headhunters recruits critical facilities, data center operations, construction and delivery, commissioning, power and cooling, and executive talent for colocation, hyperscale and enterprise sites. We research the market, contact working people and qualify a shortlist for your opening. No upfront fee. You pay only if you hire.

A buyer who searches by a familiar title often misses the better candidate, because the exact task and reporting line say more about the work than the title does.

This is what we do all day: recruit data center professionals.

No postings. No stacks of resumes. No chasing. You interview a short list.

No upfront fee. You pay only if you hire.

Start a SearchBook a 15-minute callCall 305-306-4829

No upfront fee. You pay only if you hire.

We offer a candidate replacement guarantee on standard search agreements. The applicable period and exact terms are set out in the signed client recruiting agreement.

Start a Search

Step 1 of 2

No upfront fee. You pay only if you hire.

The role and how to reach you
Optional search details

How soon? (optional)

Looking for a job? Join our talent network.

Need someone now? Call 305-306-4829.

6

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

I

J

L

M

N

O

P

Q

R

S

T

U

V

W

What does this hire really come down to?

Titles in data center work drift. A person called a project manager at a contractor may do what an owner calls a construction manager. A site manager in one company may be a critical facilities manager in another. If you search only by title, you will meet people who sound right and are not.

Task and reporting line are better guides. Ask what the person does on a normal day, which decisions they make and who they answer to. If two people with different titles do the same work, they are the same role for your purposes. If two people with the same title do different work, they are not.

The directory on this page lists every role alphabetically so that you can find the closest match by scanning for the work, not the label. Use it as a check on your own description. If the role you wrote does not match one listing, it may combine two. Split it, or accept that you need a person who spans them and will be harder to find. Be careful not to chase a perfect match. A candidate who has done eighty percent of the tasks and has led a similar team may be a better hire than one who has the exact title.

What do we check before you see anyone?

  • Daily tasks: write the five things the person will do each week and compare them with the role descriptions.
  • Decisions: list the decisions they make alone and which need approval. Roles with similar tasks differ here.
  • Reporting line: write who they answer to and who answers to them. The same title changes with the line.
  • Site type: note whether the site is a build, a live operation or a mix. It narrows the match.
  • Credentials: list required licenses and certifications by name, not by general category.
  • Similar titles: note which other titles you have seen for the same work and check them in the directory.
  • Team size: write how many people the person leads and what they do.

Where do we find these candidates?

Searching by task widens the pool. A buyer who looks for a commissioning lead will also meet people titled commissioning manager, Cx lead or testing superintendent, which is useful. People move for scope, not for a title. If a seat offers the scope they have been asking for, the label matters less.

Describe it in tasks.

Candidates read your description for specifics. A task-based brief attracts people who have done the work. They also respond when you describe what the first month looks like.

Some searches have no obvious title match, such as those that combine operations and project work. In those cases, describe the two halves separately and check which candidates have done both.

Which hiring mistakes should you avoid?

  • Using the familiar title and attracting people who have never done the work. Familiar titles hide different scopes.
  • Combining two roles in one description and wondering why no one fits. A mixed description gets mixed candidates.
  • Copying a job description from another site without changing the reporting line. Reporting lines drive authority.

How the search runs

  1. Write the task list

    List what the person will do and decide. Avoid the title until the end. Include who reviews the person's work and how often.

  2. Match it in the directory

    Scan the alphabetical list and find the roles that match your tasks. Note any that overlap. Note where two roles share tasks, since that is where your brief may be unclear.

  3. Send us your draft

    We will compare it with the directory and tell you where the role is unclear or doubled. We will suggest changes to the wording where a task points to a different role.

Questions

Why does the reporting line matter more than the title?

It shows the authority the person will have. Two people with the same title can do very different work. Write the line first.

What if the directory shows two similar roles?

Compare their tasks and choose the one that matches yours. If both fit, you probably have a combined seat.

Should I change my title to match the market?

Use the common title in public, but describe the real tasks. Candidates look at tasks.

How do I handle a hybrid role?

Decide which side is primary. Search for that, and test the second side in interviews.

How can I check my description?

Send it to us. We will compare it with the role pages and flag gaps.

Does it matter if my site uses a title that is not in the directory?

No. Use your title internally and describe the tasks. We map them to the closest listings.

Tell us who you need

Step 1 of 2

No upfront fee. You pay only if you hire.

The role and how to reach you
Optional search details

How soon? (optional)

Looking for a job? Join our talent network.

CallStart a SearchGet a free talent snapshotGet a free job description review